performance-reviews

Diagnose underperformance and structure performance review conversations for managers.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/imsus/cto --skill performance-reviews-imsus
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: performance-reviews
Source: https://github.com/imsus/cto/tree/main/.agents/skills/performance-reviews
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/imsus/cto --skill performance-reviews-imsus

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps managers diagnose why someone is underperforming and gives a structured approach to writing and conducting performance reviews, deciding on a PIP, promotion case, or separation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Performance diagnosis and root-cause framing: Uses a left-to-right diagnostic path (resources, training, desire, fit, ability) to prevent jumping to conclusions.
  • Actionable manager process: Provides a clear progression from understanding the issue to addressing root causes, then confronting persistent behavior, and escalating decisions when needed.
  • Review and conversation language: Supplies expectations management guidance, evidence/feedback capture, and scriptable wording for manager-to-employee discussions.
  • Decision heuristics and guardrails: Includes practical tests (e.g., relief test) and timing guidance (e.g., not firing too late) to avoid indefinite deferral.

Quick Start

Use the performance-reviews skill when discussing performance issues by asking for a diagnosis plus a concrete next-step plan for the review conversation.

Frequently Asked Questions about performance-reviews

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I diagnose employee underperformance before starting a performance review?

Diagnose underperformance using a left-to-right path covering resources, training, desire, fit, and ability. This prevents jumping to conclusions and structures the performance review conversation with evidence-based recommendations.

What's the best way to structure a PIP conversation for an underperforming employee?

Structure a PIP conversation by following a clear progression from understanding the issue to addressing root causes, confronting persistent behavior, and escalating separation decisions. Manager-ready wording and decision checkpoints guide each step.

How do I write performance calibration feedback for inconsistent employees?

Write performance calibration feedback by capturing evidence and applying decision heuristics like the relief test. This provides expectations management guidance and scriptable wording for manager-to-employee discussions during review cycles.

When should I escalate an underperformance case to a separation decision?

Escalate to a separation decision after addressing root causes and confronting persistent behavior. Decision heuristics and timing guardrails prevent indefinite deferral, ensuring managers do not fire too late or delay necessary separation actions.

Can I use this approach for promotion cases as well as underperformance?

Yes, the performance review approach applies to promotion cases, support plans, PIP steps, and separation decisions. It requires engineering manager context and role-specific reports to produce evidence-based recommendations.

What context do I need to provide for accurate performance review recommendations?

Provide engineering manager context and role-specific reports when available. This inputs the diagnostic process to produce evidence-based recommendations, manager-ready wording, and decision checkpoints for review conversations.