performing-cms-specific-security-testing

Tests WordPress, Drupal, and Joomla installations for known CVEs, misconfigurations, and exploitable attack vectors.

954|172|Updated Mar 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xalgord/xalgorix --skill performing-cms-specific-security-testing
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: performing-cms-specific-security-testing
Source: https://github.com/xalgord/xalgorix/tree/main/internal/tools/skills/data/web-application-security/performing-cms-specific-security-testing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xalgord/xalgorix --skill performing-cms-specific-security-testing

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CMS platforms like WordPress, Drupal, and Joomla expose large attack surfaces through outdated plugins, themes, and core versions, and manual testing of each platform's unique attack vectors is slow and error-prone. This Skill provides a structured workflow to fingerprint CMS platforms, enumerate components, validate known vulnerabilities, and confirm exploitability without false positives.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • CMS Fingerprinting and Enumeration: Detect platform and version for WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, and Magento using manual curl checks and tools like whatweb, WPScan, and droopescan.
  • Platform-Specific Exploitation: Test WordPress XML-RPC brute force, Drupalgeddon RCE (CVE-2018-7600), Joomla extension SQL injection, and exposed configuration or backup files.
  • False-Positive Avoidance: Every finding requires confirmation, such as verifying command output in responses or sensitive content in exposed files, rather than trusting version banners.
  • Use Case: During an authorized pentest, you fingerprint a target as WordPress 6.2.1, enumerate users via the REST API, then use XML-RPC system.multicall to test hundreds of passwords per request and confirm admin access.

Quick Start

Ask the agent to fingerprint the CMS running on the authorized target and test it for known vulnerabilities using WPScan, droopescan, and nuclei.

Frequently Asked Questions about performing-cms-specific-security-testing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I test a WordPress site for vulnerabilities?

Run WPScan with the enumerate flag for users, plugins, themes, and timthumbs, supplying a WPScan API token for vulnerability data. Then manually verify findings, such as checking XML-RPC exposure, debug.log files, and wp-config backups, since version banners alone do not confirm exploitability.

How to check if a Drupal site is vulnerable to Drupalgeddon?

Send a crafted POST request to /user/register with the ajax form parameters targeting CVE-2018-7600 and check whether the command output, such as id, appears in the response body. A bare 200 status code is not proof; the command must actually execute and return output.

What tools scan WordPress, Drupal, and Joomla sites?

WPScan covers WordPress with plugin, theme, and user enumeration. droopescan handles Drupal, Joomla, and SilverStripe, JoomScan targets Joomla specifically, and CMSmap plus nuclei with CMS-tagged templates work across multiple platforms.

Can XML-RPC be used to bypass WordPress login rate limiting?

Yes, the XML-RPC system.multicall method allows testing hundreds of password candidates in a single request, bypassing login lockout plugins and CAPTCHAs on wp-login.php. A successful credential returns a struct containing isAdmin or the blog list, confirming the brute-force channel works.

Why does a reported vulnerable CMS version turn out to be a false positive?

Version fingerprinting is only a lead because security fixes are often backported without version bumps, or the vulnerable component may be disabled. Confirm each finding by reproducing the issue, such as triggering the actual code path or verifying sensitive content in the response body.

When should CMS-specific testing not be performed?

Only perform this testing with written authorization covering CMS testing in the penetration testing agreement. It is also lower priority when fingerprinting shows no identifiable CMS, in which case generic web application testing is more appropriate.