skills.rest
suhwan
suhwanCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

phase-8-review

Identify architecture inconsistencies and quality gaps in a codebase.

Updated Feb 1, 2026
Search Tags:#refactoring#code-quality#code-review#architecture-review#gap-analysis#design-consistency#pdca
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/suhwan/claude-registry --skill phase-8-review-suhwan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: phase-8-review
Source: https://github.com/suhwan/claude-registry/tree/main/skills/quality/bkit-phase-8-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/suhwan/claude-registry --skill phase-8-review-suhwan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Phase 8 review identifies architecture inconsistencies and quality gaps in a codebase, enabling teams to catch issues before deployment and maintain a coherent design throughout the software lifecycle.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Architecture consistency checks across modules and components.
  • Convention compliance verification and gap analysis with actionable plans.
  • Deliverables include architecture-review.md, convention-review.md, and refactoring-plan.md for traceability and remediation.

Quick Start

Run Phase 8 review to generate the architecture, convention, and refactoring deliverables for the new module.

Frequently Asked Questions about phase-8-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an architecture review to identify design inconsistencies in my codebase?▼

An architecture review identifies design inconsistencies by enforcing PDCA-guided phases to check module consistency. It generates structured deliverables like architecture-review.md to trace issues and maintain coherent software design throughout the lifecycle.

What is the best way to generate a refactoring plan for post-implementation code quality gaps?▼

Generating a refactoring plan for code quality gaps involves running a structured gap analysis to produce a refactoring-plan.md artifact. This enforces PDCA cycles to deliver actionable remediation steps and integrate with existing deployment pipelines.

How do I check convention compliance and produce an actionable gap analysis?▼

Checking convention compliance requires verifying coding standards across components to find quality gaps. This process yields a convention-review.md artifact that outlines traceability and provides a structured improvement plan for remediation.

Does this code review approach work for post-implementation reviews and refactor initiatives?▼

Yes, this code review approach is explicitly designed for post-implementation reviews and refactor initiatives. It applies PDCA-guided phases to catch architecture inconsistencies and quality gaps before deployment, producing structured deliverables for remediation.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
musujmusuj

phase-8-review

Review codebases for architecture consistency, convention compliance, and design gaps.

Community
Advanced
solitasrohsolitasroh
2

phase-8-review

Identify architecture and convention mismatches across MCU/MPU/WPF projects.

Community
Advanced
applewaveapplewave
1

phase-8-review

Verify codebase quality and architectural conformance across project phases.

Community
Advanced
popup-studio-aipopup-studio-ai
589

phase-8-review

Automate architecture and code quality reviews with gap-analysis reports.

Official
Advanced