phase5-review

Coordinate paired Phase 5 reviews across Case A, B, and C contexts.

Updated Apr 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/YurainSoon/research-director --skill phase5-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: phase5-review
Source: https://github.com/YurainSoon/research-director/tree/main/.claude/skills/phase5-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/YurainSoon/research-director --skill phase5-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinates the orchestration of two parallel reviewers for Phase 5, including precondition checks, structured outputs, and routing decisions to the exit-check and downstream loops.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrates Case A/B/C review workflows using Phase 0 IDEA, framework specs, latest story checks, and Phase 3/Phase 4 summaries.
  • Enforces preconditions, formats and validates reviewer outputs, and writes round-reported artifacts.
  • Routes results and flags when Loop 4 is needed or when Phase 6 drafting should proceed.

Quick Start

Provide phase5-review inputs, then trigger parallel reviewer invocations and await phase5-exit-check results.

Frequently Asked Questions about phase5-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate peer-review for research artifacts to surface gaps?

To coordinate peer-review for research artifacts, this skill orchestrates paired reviewers across Case A, B, and C contexts using IDEA.md, framework specs, and phase summaries to validate outputs and surface gaps.

What inputs do I need to run a paired AI-agent review for phase 5?

Running a paired AI-agent review requires Phase 0 IDEA.md, framework specs, latest story checks, and Phase 3/Phase 4 summaries to enforce preconditions and drive reviewer invocations.

How does orchestration handle routing after validating reviewer outputs?

After validating reviewer outputs, the orchestration routes results to phase5-exit-check or downstream loops, flagging when Loop 4 is needed or when Phase 6 drafting should safely proceed.

Can I use this orchestration for serial instead of parallel research artifact reviews?

Yes, the orchestration supports both parallel and serial reviewer invocations across Case A, B, and C contexts to evaluate research artifacts and format structured outputs.

When should Loop 4 be triggered in a peer-review workflow?

Loop 4 should be triggered when the orchestration detects unresolved gaps in the research artifacts and flags the need for downstream loops before allowing a safe handoff to Phase 6.