phased-review

To verify an implementation plan against an existing codebase, cross-reference proposed changes with live source code patterns, type definitions, and architectural invariants. This validation process ensures plan readiness and identifies blast radius before execution.

Codebase architecture validation is the process of rigorously checking proposed technical plans against actual source code. You need it before starting complex refactoring to prevent implementation drift and ensure assumptions about dependencies and test coverage are accurate.

Yes, you can check interface contracts and type definitions before refactoring by performing deep source code analysis. This verifies numeric constants and security-sensitive logic, ensuring proposed changes comply with strict Definition of Done requirements.

The best way to identify blast radius for a technical plan is employing risk-scaled analysis with specialized lenses like adversary and domain verification. This exposes security vulnerabilities and logic gaps by validating claims against live source code.

Implementation drift occurs when technical plan assumptions about existing patterns are inaccurate. Multiple review rounds prevent it by continuously enforcing strict DoD compliance and cross-referencing proposed changes across specialized verification lenses before execution.