phd-intro-drafter

Generates a six-paragraph Introduction outline for technical research papers with aligned contributions.

52|Updated Apr 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Immortalqx/my_codex_skills --skill phd-intro-drafter-immortalqx
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: phd-intro-drafter
Source: https://github.com/Immortalqx/my_codex_skills/tree/main/phd-intro-drafter
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Immortalqx/my_codex_skills --skill phd-intro-drafter-immortalqx

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Writing a paper Introduction that holds together as one logical argument is hard: limitations, challenges, solution modules, and contributions often drift apart, and reviewers reject papers whose story breaks. This Skill turns a structured set of research inputs into a coherent six-paragraph Introduction outline with explicit gap detection. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Six-Paragraph Flowchart: Produces purpose, writing points, and severity-tagged gaps for Background, Limitations, Problem Essence/Goal, Challenges, Solution Overview, and Contributions. - Paper-Type Positioning: Classifies the paper as Technique or New Problem/Setting and adjusts paragraph weighting accordingly, with worked examples from Alpha-SQL, AFlow, and LEAD. - Integrity Gate: Enforces one-to-one challenge-to-module mapping, section-numbered contributions, running-example continuity, and bans vague contribution phrasing. - Use Case: After your research idea passes evaluation, feed in your area, limitations, constraints, key idea, and challenges to receive a complete Introduction outline before writing any prose. ## Quick Start Use phd-intro-drafter to turn my paper concept on iterative data selection into a six-paragraph Introduction outline with aligned contributions.

Frequently Asked Questions about phd-intro-drafter

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure an Introduction for a research paper?

Use a six-paragraph flowchart: background with a running example, at most three limitations of prior work, problem essence and goal, at most three key challenges, a solution overview mapping one module per challenge, and three to four contributions each citing a section number.

What is the difference between a Technique paper and a New Problem paper?

A Technique paper contributes a new method on an established problem, so the Key Idea carries the narrative and the Goal is a one-sentence bridge. A New Problem/Setting paper contributes the problem formulation itself, making the Goal paragraph load-bearing.

How many contributions should a paper Introduction list?

Three or four numbered contributions is the canonical count. Each must name a specific mechanism or result, cite the section that delivers it, and avoid vague phrases like "extensive experiments" or "comprehensive analysis".

When should I not use this Introduction outlining approach?

Do not use it when the core research idea is still unstable, when writing a benchmark paper which follows a different flowchart, or when you only need to polish already-structured Introduction prose rather than restructure the storyline.

What makes a good running example in a paper Introduction?

A good running example is real, specific, simple enough to grasp in 30 seconds, and reveals where prior methods fail. It should recur in the problem formulation, methodology walkthrough, and experiments as a case study rather than appearing only in Figure 1.