What problem does it solve? Draft papers often contain hidden issues—broken logic chains, grammar errors, LaTeX formatting mistakes, weak figures, and AI-tone vocabulary—that reviewers flag or that sink a submission. This Skill audits a full paper or key sections before the deadline and produces a prioritized, severity-tagged list of findings so authors know exactly what to fix first. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five-dimension review: Checks macro logic, writing details, English grammar, LaTeX formatting, and figure quality against canonical rule references. - Severity taxonomy: Tags every finding as CRITICAL, MAJOR, or MINOR, with CRITICAL items blocking submission until addressed. - Banned-vocabulary and em-dash scan: Detects AI-tone words (e.g., innovative, groundbreaking-style hyperbole) and em-dash misuse across the entire paper. - Use Case: Three days before a conference deadline, submit your draft and receive a structured report quoting specific problem sentences, citing the exact grammar or LaTeX rule violated, and ending with a 1-10 score and submission recommendation. ## Quick Start Use the phd-pre-submission-reviewer skill to review this paper draft and list all CRITICAL and MAJOR issues before submission.
