philosophy-enforcer

Enforce engineering governance by converting interview input into an enforceable canon and applying rubric-based decision gates to proposed changes. This prevents drift from mission, trust boundaries, security, reliability, and performance posture during feature design and change review.

Philosophy enforcement is a gate-based compliance review mechanism that scores proposed work against rubric rules. It captures non-negotiable principles in a canonical file, evaluates changes, and returns explicit PASS, CONDITIONAL, or FAIL verdicts with required remediations.

Align architecture and UX changes by running a philosophy interview, updating canonical rules, and scoring the proposed work against enforcement rubrics. The gate-based compliance review blocks non-negotiable failures and outputs explicit remediation steps.

Yes, you can evaluate documentation standards by capturing tradeoffs during the philosophy interview and applying them through rubric scoring. The enforcement mechanism checks proposed documentation against the canonical rules and outputs a final approval logic verdict.

Rubric-based compliance review requires a completed interview protocol and canonical rule updates before it can function. It cannot evaluate changes without explicit evidence, and all CONDITIONAL or FAIL verdicts demand specific remediations before approval logic proceeds.

Yes, philosophy enforcement evaluates code changes by scoring them against the canonical rules and enforcement rubric. It reviews reliability posture alongside mission and trust boundaries, returning an explicit verdict with remediation steps for any non-negotiable failures.