physics-teacher-ops

To generate a physics exam analysis, ingest the exam paper, answer keys, and per-question scores. The workflow aligns the data and produces actionable summaries to facilitate class discussions and targeted reviews.

Yes, you can ingest per-question scores from xls or xlsx files. The system aligns these scores with the exam paper to generate versioned mem0 entries and update individual student profiles after teacher confirmation.

Managing a physics knowledge-point taxonomy involves ingesting exam materials to map questions to specific concepts. This process supports targeted homework generation and curates lesson assets for pre-class checks and post-class diagnostics.

Lesson planning integrates with post-class diagnostics by coordinating classroom workflows. After generating an exam analysis, teachers plan pre-class checks, run diagnostics, and update student memory profiles to ensure continuous and traceable improvements.

Yes, the workflow enforces data governance by using versioned mem0 entries with overrides for student profiles. This ensures that all updates to knowledge-point taxonomy and exam summaries remain traceable throughout the teaching process.

You should avoid automated workflows when you lack structured input data, as the system requires ingested exams, answer keys, and per-question scores to generate accurate analyses, lesson plans, and student profile updates.