pilot-fleet-conformance

Aggregate cub-scout evidence into a fleet-wide PASS/WATCH/ASK/BLOCK conformance verdict.

14|Updated Jan 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/confighub/cub-scout --skill pilot-fleet-conformance
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pilot-fleet-conformance
Source: https://github.com/confighub/cub-scout/tree/main/skills/pilot-fleet-conformance
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/confighub/cub-scout --skill pilot-fleet-conformance

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you decide whether a fleet is conformant by turning cub-scout evidence across many clusters and resources into a single, strategy-anchored compliance verdict suitable for governance workflows.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Fleet-wide verdict synthesis: Rolls per-resource PASS/WATCH/ASK/BLOCK outcomes into one fleet-level verdict using max-severity (Pilot framing).
  • Scope-driven conformance checks: Works over a ConfigHub View scope (preferred) or falls back to namespace or full cluster scope.
  • Evidence-backed receipts: Optionally verifies and saves per-resource receipts so the verdict can be attached to compliance tickets.
  • Outlier detection across clusters: Flags cross-cluster mismatches against a View baseline to support fleet-level escalation decisions.

Quick Start

Ask Pilot for the fleet verdict for a ConfigHub View scope so it can compute per-resource conformance and return a single PASS/WATCH/ASK/BLOCK outcome with drill-down blockers when needed.

Frequently Asked Questions about pilot-fleet-conformance

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a Kubernetes fleet-wide conformance verdict across multiple clusters?

To generate a Kubernetes fleet-wide conformance verdict, aggregate three-way and source-truth evidence across clusters or namespaces. This rolls per-resource outcomes into a single strategy-anchored PASS, WATCH, ASK, or BLOCK decision for governance workflows.

How does GitOps conformance checking work for detecting cross-cluster outliers?

GitOps conformance checking flags cross-cluster mismatches by comparing resource states against a View baseline. It aggregates evidence to detect outliers across multiple clusters, supporting fleet-level escalation decisions when configurations diverge from the expected source-truth.

Can I use namespace or cluster scope instead of a View for compliance automation checks?

You can use namespace or full cluster scope for compliance automation checks if a View is unavailable. A ConfigHub View is the preferred scope for fleet-wide verdict synthesis, but the system falls back to namespace or cluster boundaries as needed.

Do I need connected mode to verify evidence receipts for compliance tickets?

You need connected mode to verify and save per-resource evidence receipts for compliance tickets. Connected mode is required for View-based and fleet outlier surfaces, ensuring the conformance verdict is backed by verifiable source-truth data.

What is the difference between PASS, WATCH, ASK, and BLOCK verdicts in multi-cluster compliance?

PASS, WATCH, ASK, and BLOCK verdicts represent escalating severity levels in multi-cluster compliance. The system rolls per-resource outcomes into one fleet-level verdict using max-severity framing, where BLOCK indicates hard failures and WATCH or ASK flag issues needing review.

Does Kubernetes conformance verification modify cluster resources during a GitOps audit?

Kubernetes conformance verification stays strictly read-only during a GitOps audit and does not modify cluster resources. It computes per-resource conformance by comparing evidence and generating a verdict, while Pilot handles the verdict framing without applying changes.