pipeline-judge

Adversarial review of business plan artefacts identifies inconsistencies, inflated promises, and unverified assumptions by systematically challenging numbers, buyer personas, and internal coherence against ground-truth data.

Adversarial review systematically challenges plan-final.md documents by cross-checking numbers, assumptions, and buyer personas for internal consistency, realism, and completeness to surface factual gaps early in the planning process.

Cross-data validation compares plan artefacts against research-web.json, research-benchmarks.json, and ground-truth.json inputs to surface mismatches and verify coherence, realism, and completeness across cross-project version folders.

Structured reporting outputs a formal JUDGE-REPORT.json file containing the verdict, scores, identified issues, and recommended actions directly into the appropriate project version directory.

Adversarial fact-checking requires inputs such as plan-final.md, cross-project version folders, research-web.json, research-benchmarks.json, and ground-truth.json to verify coherence and generate a validation report.

Adversarial review is used early in the planning process to detect unverified assumptions and factual gaps, ensuring plan artefacts maintain coherence and realism before finalizing business strategies.