pl-logic

Audit NIW petition letter arguments against the Dhanasar framework and USCIS Policy Manual.

Updated Jul 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ivy3h/niw-petition-toolkit --skill pl-logic
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pl-logic
Source: https://github.com/ivy3h/niw-petition-toolkit/tree/main/skills/pl-logic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ivy3h/niw-petition-toolkit --skill pl-logic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill performs an in-depth logical/argumentative audit on EB-2 NIW petition letters, helping users validate their reasoning, consistency, and evidence structure before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Logical Argument Analysis: Checks if evidence supports conclusions, cross-prong causality, and scope.
  • Dhanasar Framework: Verifies compliance with the USCIS Policy Manual and Matter of Dhanasar guidelines.
  • Use Case: Ideal for immigration professionals who need to validate complex petition letters for consistency, logical flow, and adherence to immigration regulations.

Quick Start

Execute a logic audit on the NIW petition letter by using the command "/pl-logic".

Frequently Asked Questions about pl-logic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a consistency check on an EB-2 NIW petition letter?

To perform a consistency check on an EB-2 NIW petition letter, execute the logic audit using the /pl-logic command. This analyzes the textual evidence to identify causal relationships and logical consistency issues against the Dhanasar framework.

What is logical analysis for NIW petitions under the Dhanasar framework?

Logical analysis for NIW petitions is an argumentative audit verifying that evidence supports conclusions and adheres to the Dhanasar framework. It checks cross-prong causality and scope to ensure robust immigration arguments before submission.

How do I audit petition evidence for cross-prong causality issues?

You audit petition evidence for cross-prong causality by processing structured textual arguments through a logical audit. This identifies whether the evidence consistently supports conclusions across the Dhanasar framework's prongs.

Do I need a manual rubric for NIW petition logical audits?

Yes, a manual rubric input is required for reference during the NIW petition audit process. This rubric guides the logical analysis to accurately verify argumentation consistency against USCIS Policy Manual guidelines.

When should I use a logical audit tool for immigration petitions?

You should use a logical audit tool for immigration petitions when validating complex EB-2 NIW letters before submission. It is ideal for immigration professionals needing to verify logical flow, reasoning, and adherence to regulations.

What is the best way to verify NIW petition compliance with USCIS Policy Manual?

The best way to verify NIW petition compliance is running a structured logical audit checking argumentation against the USCIS Policy Manual. This validates reasoning, consistency, and evidence structure prior to submission.