plan-ceo-review

Review strategic CEO plans across four scope decision modes.

1|Updated Mar 1, 2026

Search Tags:#planning #roadmap #strategy #risk-assessment #expansion #ceo-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/anishs1207/agentic-cli --skill plan-ceo-review-anishs1207

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/anishs1207/agentic-cli/tree/main/.agents/skills/gstack-plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anishs1207/agentic-cli --skill plan-ceo-review-anishs1207

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill guides rigorous CEO-level plan reviews, helping teams rethink scope, challenge assumptions, and surface opportunities to maximize impact while avoiding scope creep.

Core Features & Use Cases

SCOPE EXPANSION: dream big and surface strategic opportunities that could improve the product or business.
SELECTIVE EXPANSION: hold core scope while cherry-picking expansions with the highest potential return.
HOLD SCOPE: enforce rigorous constraints, risk checks, and decision discipline.
SCOPE REDUCTION: strip away non-essential elements to achieve a focused, high-confidence plan.
Use Case: When asked to "think bigger" or "is this ambitious enough," the skill proactively surfaces expansion ideas and trade-offs.

Quick Start

Run the CEO-review workflow on your current plan to start a proactive, complete assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review a strategic plan to ensure it is ambitious enough for a CEO presentation?▼

To review a strategic plan for a CEO presentation, rigorously challenge scope, ambition, and feasibility using a guided decision framework. This surfaces tradeoffs, risks, and expansion opportunities to maximize impact while preventing scope creep.

When should I use scope expansion versus selective expansion in a roadmap review?▼

Use scope expansion to dream big and surface strategic opportunities, while selective expansion holds the core scope and cherry-picks only the highest potential return additions. The choice depends on your project's risk tolerance and resource capacity.

What is the best way to reduce scope creep during product strategy planning?▼

The best way to reduce scope creep is applying scope reduction mode to strip away non-essential elements, achieving a focused, high-confidence plan. Alternatively, hold scope mode enforces rigorous constraints and decision discipline.

Can I assess risk and feasibility for market expansion proposals using this framework?▼

Yes, you can assess risk and feasibility for market expansion proposals. The framework rigorously challenges project assumptions and applies risk checks across product, market, and technology projects currently in the planning phase.

How does a guided decision framework surface tradeoffs in technology roadmap decisions?▼

A guided decision framework surfaces tradeoffs in technology roadmap decisions by evaluating scope against ambition and feasibility constraints. It proactively identifies expansion ideas and actionable next steps while highlighting potential project risks.

What are the limitations of holding project scope during a strategic plan review?▼

Holding project scope limitations include potentially missing high-value strategic opportunities. While it enforces rigorous constraints and risk checks to maintain decision discipline, it may prevent the product or business from maximizing impact.