skills.rest
brianruggieri
brianruggieriCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

plan-ceo-review

Review product plans across expansion, hold, and reduction modes.

Updated Mar 15, 2026
Search Tags:#strategy#governance#review#execution#plan#risk#stakeholders
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/brianruggieri/claude-personalities --skill plan-ceo-review-brianruggieri
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/brianruggieri/claude-personalities/tree/main/claude/skills/gstack/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/brianruggieri/claude-personalities --skill plan-ceo-review-brianruggieri

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CEO-level product planning often suffers from ambiguous assumptions, conflicting priorities, and unclear scope. This Skill provides a disciplined review framework to surface gaps, challenge premises, and align leadership on next steps.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured three-mode framework: SCOPE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, and SCOPE REDUCTION to balance ambition with rigor.
  • Guided governance: formal decision points, acceptance criteria, and risk assessment to accelerate consensus among stakeholders.
  • Edge-case anticipation: explicit handling of failure modes, misaligned incentives, and scope creep to de-risk execution.

Quick Start

Provide a structured CEO plan review and decide on expansion, hold, or reduction by the end of the session.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a CEO-level product plan review to align leadership?▼

Structure a CEO-level product plan review by applying a three-mode framework to rigorously challenge assumptions and tradeoffs, guiding stakeholders through predefined decision points to reach consensus.

What is the best way to assess product plan risks before execution?▼

Assess product plan risks before execution by anticipating edge cases, explicitly handling failure modes, misaligned incentives, and scope creep to surface gaps and de-risk the strategy.

How do I decide between scope expansion, hold, or reduction during a strategic review?▼

Decide between scope expansion, hold, or reduction by balancing high ambition with rigor, evaluating predefined acceptance criteria, and challenging premises across the three modes.

When do I need a structured governance framework for product planning?▼

You need a structured governance framework for product planning when ambiguous assumptions, conflicting priorities, and unclear scope threaten to derail leadership alignment and execution.

Can I use this to evaluate ideation and scoping assumptions across different modes?▼

Yes, you can evaluate ideation and scoping assumptions across expansion, hold, and reduction modes, applying formal risk assessment to accelerate stakeholder consensus.

Why does product planning fail without predefined acceptance criteria and edge-case handling?▼

Product planning fails without predefined acceptance criteria and edge-case handling because ambiguous assumptions and misaligned incentives create gaps that surface only during execution.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
balajivisbalajivis
2

plan-ceo-review

Evaluate product plans by assessing assumptions, scope, risks, and strategic opportunities.

Community
Advanced
wfukatsuwfukatsu
12

validate-assumptions

Identify and validate strategic assumptions with tests and risk thresholds.

Community
Advanced
profmikegreeneprofmikegreene
1

scope-definition

Document boundaries, constraints, and acceptance criteria for pilot tasks.

Community
Intermediate
jianshuojianshuo
5

plan-ceo-review

Review project plans across scope expansion, hold, and reduction modes.

Community
Advanced