skills.rest
g4rcez
g4rcezCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@garcez_allanGitHub

plan-ceo-review

Automate CEO-level plan reviews with frontmatter-driven workflows and mode-based decisions.

48|2|Updated Dec 23, 2017
Search Tags:#planning#strategy#governance#review#risk-management#decision-making#stakeholders
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/g4rcez/dotfiles --skill plan-ceo-review-g4rcez
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/g4rcez/dotfiles/tree/main/.ai/skills/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/g4rcez/dotfiles --skill plan-ceo-review-g4rcez

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CEO/founder-level plan reviews can be inconsistent and slow. This Skill provides a repeatable, frontmatter-driven workflow to structure, challenge premises, and align stakeholders.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured preamble and mode-driven decision framework (SCOPE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, SCOPE REDUCTION) to surface risks, tradeoffs, and next actions.
  • Multi-section governance including base-branch detection, risk mapping, error/rescue plans, performance considerations, and deployment concerns.
  • Generate auditable, production-ready plan documents with an explicit Quick Start that tells a user exactly how to kick off a review.

Quick Start

Use the plan-ceo-review skill to evaluate a new product plan by selecting a mode and providing project context.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a strategic plan review to surface risks and tradeoffs?▼

A CEO plan review workflow automates rigorous assessments by enforcing a structured frontmatter-driven process. It applies mode-based decision prompts across scope expansion, hold scope, and scope reduction to challenge premises and align stakeholders.

What is the best way to evaluate whether to expand or reduce project scope during a governance review?▼

Evaluating project scope during governance reviews requires mode-selection criteria that compare current performance against strategic goals. Applying explicit scope expansion, hold, or reduction modes surfaces tradeoffs and generates audit-ready next actions.

How do I generate audit-ready planning documents for stakeholder alignment?▼

You can generate audit-ready planning documents by using a structured preamble workflow that includes base-branch detection, risk mapping, and error rescue plans. This process outputs production-ready artifacts with explicit stakeholder review prompts.

Can I use this structured review process for early-stage startup risk assessment?▼

Yes, this structured review process applies to founder-level strategic planning and risk assessment across any scale. The frontmatter-driven workflow enforces consistent governance decisions regardless of project maturity.

When should I not use an automated mode-based decision framework for planning?▼

An automated mode-based decision framework should not be used when immediate, ad-hoc tactical shifts are required without stakeholder input. This structured workflow enforces a rigorous, audit-ready process that prioritizes governance over rapid, unlogged decisions.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
stefans71stefans71
5

setup

Automate FrontierBoard governance setup with integration mode detection and directory creation.

Community
Advanced
BradliebsBradliebs

plan-eng-review

Lock in execution plans for engineering architecture reviews.

Community
Advanced
joshka0joshka0
3

Dev Docs

Generate strategic development plans with phased tasks and acceptance criteria.

Community
Intermediate
neon-pilotneon-pilot

ads-quick

Fetch a homepage and score ad readiness with a concise scorecard.

Community
Basic