plan-ceo-review

Review product plans for weak scope, assumptions, and missed strategic opportunities.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GenEducation/GenedUIProject --skill plan-ceo-review-geneducation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/GenEducation/GenedUIProject/tree/main/.gemini/skills/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GenEducation/GenedUIProject --skill plan-ceo-review-geneducation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps founders and product leaders pressure-test a plan before they waste time building the wrong thing. It turns a vague idea or draft roadmap into a sharper call on whether to expand, hold, reduce, or rethink scope.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • CEO-style review: Reads a plan like a skeptical operator and challenges weak assumptions.
  • Scope calibration: Decides whether the work should grow into a better product or shrink to the minimum that still wins.
  • Edge-case discipline: Looks for missing failure modes, unclear tradeoffs, and places where the plan is too hand-wavy.
  • Decision support: Useful for roadmap reviews, launch planning, strategy critique, and pre-build sanity checks.

Quick Start

Ask for a plan-ceo-review on your draft plan and tell it to judge whether the scope should expand, hold, reduce, or be reframed.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I pressure-test a product roadmap before committing to development?

Roadmap review requires a skeptical operator perspective to challenge weak assumptions and find missed strategic opportunities. This approach scrutinizes edge cases and bad scope decisions to sharpen your product plan before execution.

What is the best way to decide between scope expansion and scope reduction for a new launch?

Choosing between scope expansion and reduction requires structured tradeoff analysis to determine if work should grow into a better product or shrink to the minimum viable winner. This scope calibration prevents overbuilding or underdelivering on your launch plan.

How does a founder-mode plan critique improve my strategy?

A founder-mode plan critique improves strategy by reading your plan like a skeptical operator to expose bad assumptions and hand-wavy tradeoffs. It delivers explicit recommendations to expand, hold, reduce, or rethink your scope before you build.

When do I need a pre-build sanity check for my product plans?

You need a pre-build sanity check when your draft plan contains unclear tradeoffs or missing failure modes that risk wasted development. This review identifies weak scope and provides explicit recommendations to improve the plan before execution.

Can I use this approach to evaluate edge cases in my draft roadmap?

Yes, evaluating edge cases involves applying discipline to find missing failure modes and unclear tradeoffs within your draft roadmap. This scrutiny ensures your plan is robust and reframes vague ideas into sharp, actionable decisions.