plan-ceo-review

Review business plans with four scope decision modes and structured critique.

2|Updated Mar 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jayzalowitz/skytwin --skill plan-ceo-review-jayzalowitz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/jayzalowitz/skytwin/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jayzalowitz/skytwin --skill plan-ceo-review-jayzalowitz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CEO-grade plan reviews help founders and leaders surface hidden risks, validate ambition, and ensure plans are resilient against execution challenges.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, SCOPE REDUCTION to steer planning.
  • Structured critique and tradeoffs, with explicit gating criteria, risk flags, and decision logs to inform stakeholders.
  • Use Case: during a quarterly planning cycle, run a CEO-review to push for bigger bets or tighten scope while maintaining outcomes.

Quick Start

Provide a thorough CEO-grade plan review and surface expansion opportunities with clear tradeoffs.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a business plan for scope and ambition tradeoffs?

A CEO-grade plan review evaluates business plans by challenging scope and ambition, applying structured critique to surface hidden risks, validate bets, and generate alternatives with explicit gating criteria.

What's the best way to evaluate a product roadmap for bigger bets?

The best way to evaluate a product roadmap for bigger bets is applying a SCOPE EXPANSION or SELECTIVE EXPANSION mode during strategy sessions, which pushes for ambitious outcomes while maintaining structured tradeoffs and decision logs.

When do I need a structured critique for a product pivot?

You need a structured critique for a product pivot when you must validate ambition and ensure plans are resilient against execution challenges, utilizing risk flags and decision logs to inform stakeholders during quarterly planning.

Can I reduce scope on an ambitious plan while maintaining outcomes?

Yes, you can reduce scope while maintaining outcomes by applying the SCOPE REDUCTION mode, which tightens plan focus and provides structured tradeoffs alongside explicit gating criteria to ensure resilience.

Does plan review work for quarterly planning cycles?

Yes, plan review works for quarterly planning cycles by running a CEO-grade review to push for bigger bets or tighten scope, tracking plan-state, and utilizing escalation hooks to inform stakeholders.

What are the limitations of holding scope during a strategy session?

Holding scope during a strategy session limits exploration of expansion opportunities, keeping outcomes fixed without bigger bets, but still provides structured critique, risk flags, and decision logs to validate the current plan.