plan-ceo-review

Critique strategic plans and identify gaps, risks, and scope decisions.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ligianehua/Gstack --skill plan-ceo-review-ligianehua
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/ligianehua/Gstack/tree/main/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ligianehua/Gstack --skill plan-ceo-review-ligianehua

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Founders and teams often struggle to translate ambitious plans into actionable roadmaps without rigorous critique that surfaces risks, gaps, and misaligned scope. This Skill applies a four-mode review framework to push clarity, guardrails, and measurable outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mode-based critique: SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, SCOPE REDUCTION to guide scope decisions.
  • Guided decision artifacts: checklists, risk notes, and a plan-review summary to share with stakeholders.
  • Trade-off awareness: helps teams consider alternatives, quantify impact, and decide what to deprioritize.

Quick Start

Describe your plan, pick a mode (Expansion, Hold Scope, Reduction), and start the review with /plan-ceo-review.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a product strategy plan to identify risks and scope gaps?

To review a product strategy plan, you apply a four-mode critique framework that analyzes strategic goals, surfaces execution risks, and enforces explicit scope decisions to produce a structured plan-review artifact.

What is scope expansion vs hold scope in roadmap planning?

Scope expansion increases roadmap deliverables, hold scope maintains current parameters, selective expansion targets specific areas, and scope reduction narrows focus to manage capacity and risk during planning.

How do I decide what to deprioritize when expanding a multi-quarter product roadmap?

You decide what to deprioritize by evaluating trade-offs, quantifying impact against organizational capacity, and selecting a scope expansion mode that forces explicit decisions on lower-impact initiatives.

Can this strategic plan review framework handle organizational scoping decisions for initial concepts?

Yes, the strategic plan review framework handles scenarios from initial concept evaluation to multi-quarter execution, applying mode-specific requirements to guide organizational scoping and roadmap planning.

What artifacts are generated from a CEO-level strategy review?

A CEO-level strategy review generates guided decision artifacts including deprioritization checklists, risk logging notes, and a comprehensive plan-review summary designed to share with stakeholders.