plan-ceo-review

Analyze CEO-level plans and propose four-mode strategy options with prioritized actions.

1|Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/martin-hsu-test/gstack-gemini-slim --skill plan-ceo-review-martin-hsu-test
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/martin-hsu-test/gstack-gemini-slim/tree/main/.gemini/skills/gstack-plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/martin-hsu-test/gstack-gemini-slim --skill plan-ceo-review-martin-hsu-test

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Streamlines strategic plan evaluation by challenging premises, uncovering ambitious but feasible directions, and guiding teams through four operating modes to align vision with execution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).
  • Proactively suggest when the user questions plan ambition or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger.
  • Generates a concrete, prioritized action plan with risk flags and clear success criteria that can be used to drive decisions and alignment.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to review your CEO plan and return a four-mode expansion strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a four-mode strategy for evaluating an ambitious product roadmap?

A four-mode strategy evaluates a product roadmap by proposing options across scope expansion, selective expansion, hold scope, and scope reduction. This approach balances ambition with feasibility by assessing risks and prerequisites to align vision with execution.

How do I review a CEO-level plan to balance ambition with feasibility?

Review a CEO-level plan by challenging premises, analyzing constraints, and evaluating success criteria across four operating modes. This generates a prioritized, edge-case-aware action plan with risk flags to guide stakeholder alignment.

When do I need a formal plan review for scope expansion?

You need a formal plan review for scope expansion when questioning plan ambition or feeling the strategy could think bigger. It uncovers ambitious but feasible directions by evaluating risks and prerequisites across four operating modes.

What is the best way to align stakeholders on organizational goals and governance plans?

The best way to align stakeholders on organizational goals is generating a concrete, prioritized action plan with risk flags and clear success criteria. This drives decisions by evaluating scope reduction or expansion options against current constraints.

What are the limitations of using a selective expansion mode for product strategy?

Selective expansion mode limits product strategy by holding the current scope while cherry-picking only specific expansions. It requires rigorous risk assessment and clear success criteria to avoid overextending resources beyond feasible prerequisites.

How do I generate a prioritized action plan with risk flags from a current strategy?

Generate a prioritized action plan by inputting your current plan, constraints, and success criteria. The review process challenges premises and outputs recommended actions with edge-case awareness and explicit risk flags for decision-making.