plan-ceo-review

Reviews development plans through an 11-section CEO-mode scope and rigor audit.

Updated Aug 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/raghavbadhwar/rstack --skill plan-ceo-review-raghavbadhwar
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/raghavbadhwar/rstack/tree/main/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/raghavbadhwar/rstack --skill plan-ceo-review-raghavbadhwar

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Plans often ship with unchallenged assumptions, narrow scope, and hidden failure modes. This Skill stress-tests a plan the way a CEO or founder would: questioning premises, expanding or reducing scope deliberately, and forcing every finding through an explicit user decision before anything changes. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Four scope modes: SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, and SCOPE REDUCTION, chosen interactively at the start of the review. - 11-section deep review: architecture, error and rescue mapping, security threat model, data flow edge cases, code quality, tests, performance, observability, deployment, long-term trajectory, and design/UX, each with mandatory per-finding user questions. - Outside voice cross-check: runs an independent second opinion via the Codex CLI or a Claude subagent, then surfaces cross-model disagreements for the user to resolve. - Use Case: Before committing a team to a quarter of work, run this review on the plan to catch unrescued error paths, missing rollback steps, and scope that is either too timid or too large. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to run a CEO-mode strategy review on the current plan to challenge its scope and find gaps before implementation.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a product plan for scope and ambition?

Invoke the plan-ceo-review skill on the plan file. It walks through four scope modes (expansion, selective expansion, hold, reduction), then runs an 11-section deep review where every finding is presented as an individual decision question before any change is made.

What does the 11-section plan review cover?

The review covers architecture, error and rescue mapping, security threat modeling, data flow edge cases, code quality, tests, performance, observability, deployment and rollout, long-term trajectory, and design/UX. No section may be skipped; sections with zero findings are explicitly marked as such.

Does the plan review get a second opinion from another AI model?

Yes. After the section review, it runs an outside voice check using the Codex CLI when installed and authenticated, falling back to a Claude subagent otherwise. Cross-model disagreements are surfaced to the user, who decides each one explicitly.

Can the review modify my plan automatically?

No. Every finding, including ones with obvious fixes, requires explicit user approval through a structured decision question. Outside voice recommendations are informational only and are never applied without user consent.

When should I use CEO-mode review instead of an engineering plan review?

Use CEO-mode review when questioning scope, ambition, or strategy of a plan, such as when asked to think bigger or rethink an approach. Use an engineering plan review for architecture and implementation rigor once scope is settled.