plan-ceo-review

Review a strategic plan for scope creep by applying a CEO-grade evaluation that challenges scope, assumptions, and failure modes. This governance workflow enforces a Step 0 system audit and design-doc checks to surface gaps before execution.

Align product and engineering stakeholders by integrating handoff notes, design decisions, and design-doc checks within the plan review. This formal plan-status workflow ensures completeness and collaboration across business goals.

Decide between scope expansion and reduction by using a multi-mode review process. It evaluates whether a plan requires expansion, selective expansion, holding scope, or reduction to shape outcomes toward ambitious but achievable goals.

Yes, this plan review process requires a mandatory Step 0 system audit. Front-loaded governance enforces this preliminary audit alongside risk and failure-mode mapping to ensure precise scoping decisions before execution.

Map failure modes and risks in a design document by applying a formal CEO-level evaluation. The review enforces risk mapping and design-doc alignment checks to prevent misaligned bets and identify execution path vulnerabilities.

You should not use an automated plan review workflow for tactical tasks lacking strategic business goals or design documents. The process requires multi-mode scoping decisions and a Step 0 system audit to properly evaluate execution risks.