plan-ceo-review

Name: plan-ceo-review
Availability: InStock
Author: steffenpharai

Review strategic plans and reframe scope using four decision modes.

Updated Aug 27, 2026

Search Tags:#strategy #scope #decision-making #ceo #plan-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/steffenpharai/StartupFramework --skill plan-ceo-review-steffenpharai

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/steffenpharai/StartupFramework/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/steffenpharai/StartupFramework --skill plan-ceo-review-steffenpharai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Founders and executives often struggle to articulate and scope strategic plans. This Skill guides a rigorous CEO plan review, surfaces misalignments, and provides a structured way to expand or constrain the plan to maximize long-term impact.

Core Features & Use Cases

Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, and SCOPE REDUCTION, each with explicit prompts and decision gates.
Premise Challenge, 10x-drift checks, and opt-in ceremonies to surface better alternatives.
AskUserQuestion-driven workflows that ensure decisions are explicit and replayable.

Quick Start

Begin the CEO plan review and choose a mode (Expansion, Selective Expansion, Hold, or Reduction) to shape the scope.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review a strategic plan and decide whether to expand or reduce scope?▼

A CEO plan review identifies critical gaps in strategic plans and reframes them to maximize long-term impact. It surfaces misalignments and provides a structured way to expand or constrain plan boundaries during high-stakes strategy sessions.

What is the best way to scope an early-stage product roadmap for maximum impact?▼

Scoping a product roadmap requires challenging premises and running 10x-drift checks to surface better alternatives. Using explicit decision gates helps determine whether to expand selectively, hold, or reduce scope for long-term impact.

How do I run a CEO-level plan review session that records explicit decisions?▼

Run a CEO plan review using AskUserQuestion-driven workflows that guide decisions and record outcomes explicitly. This ensures every scope adjustment or premise challenge during the strategy session is documented and replayable.

Can I use scope reduction to tighten a strategic plan that has drifted off course?▼

Yes, Scope Reduction mode explicitly constrains a strategic plan to sharpen its focus and maximize impact. It applies premise challenges and 10x-drift checks to determine if tightening scope yields better long-term outcomes than expanding.

When should I choose selective expansion over full scope expansion in a strategy review?▼

Choose Selective Expansion over full Scope Expansion when the plan review identifies specific high-value areas worth growing while maintaining core boundaries. Decision gates and opt-in ceremonies help isolate which elements deserve targeted growth.

What are the limitations of using automated decision gates for high-stakes strategy sessions?▼

Automated decision gates structure strategy sessions but rely on frontmatter metadata and AskUserQuestion prompts to function. They surface misalignments and force explicit choices between scope modes, but cannot replace executive judgment in high-stakes decisions.