plan-ceo-review

Critique CEO plans with expansion, hold, or reduction modes and ASCII diagrams.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/XDCIndia/SkyNet --skill plan-ceo-review-xdcindia
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/XDCIndia/SkyNet/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/XDCIndia/SkyNet --skill plan-ceo-review-xdcindia

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enable rigorous CEO/founder plan reviews by enforcing a structured, mode-driven critique that surfaces risks and opportunities.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured critique: enforce mode-driven reviews (EXPANSION, HOLD, REDUCTION) with guardrails.
  • Artifact generation: produce ASCII diagrams, risk maps, and failure-mode tables.
  • Decision tracing: log and present tradeoffs, with a clear recommendation path for stakeholders.

Quick Start

Start an EXPANSION-mode CEO-plan review by performing a system audit and Step 0 evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a structured critique of a founder's product roadmap?

A structured product roadmap critique applies mode-driven reviews across scope expansion, hold, or reduction. This enforces guardrails and mandates a preliminary Step 0 system audit to surface risks and opportunities before proceeding.

What is a Step 0 system audit in strategic plan reviews?

A Step 0 system audit is a mandatory preliminary evaluation performed before expanding a CEO plan. It establishes a robust, auditable strategy baseline by identifying failure modes and generating an error and rescue map.

How do I decide between scope expansion, hold, or reduction for a strategic initiative?

Deciding between scope expansion, hold, or reduction involves evaluating strategic initiatives against a formal risk map. The review process logs tradeoffs and generates a clear recommendation path for stakeholders.

Can I generate risk maps and failure-mode tables for early-stage product plans?

Yes, you can generate risk maps, failure-mode tables, and ASCII diagrams for early-stage product plans. The review process produces these artifacts to trace decisions and present tradeoffs to stakeholders.

What is the best way to elevate an early-stage product plan to an auditable strategy?

The best way to elevate an early-stage product plan to an auditable strategy is applying a rigorous, mode-driven critique. This structured approach enforces guardrails and mandates a Step 0 system audit to maximize impact.

When should I not use a mode-driven approach for CEO plan reviews?

A mode-driven approach for CEO plan reviews may not suit strategic initiatives lacking clear expansion, hold, or reduction parameters. Without a baseline for a Step 0 system audit, the structured critique cannot generate meaningful failure-mode tables.