plan-codex-review

Automates parallel three-role Codex reviews of plan files for gaps and risks.

4|Updated Jul 16, 2012
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/takashabe/dotfiles --skill plan-codex-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-codex-review
Source: https://github.com/takashabe/dotfiles/tree/main/.claude/skills/plan-codex-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/takashabe/dotfiles --skill plan-codex-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables teams to rigorously review plan files by routing them to Codex in a three-role parallel setup to surface design gaps, risks, and improvement ideas before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Three-way parallel review: Simultaneous evaluation by A: Design Reviewer, B: Security Reviewer, and C: Quality/Testing Reviewer.
  • Artifact discovery guidance: Automatically identifies plan paths, referenced files, and relevant AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md for context.
  • Structured verdict consolidation: Aggregates findings into a unified verdict with consensus and role-specific insights for decision making.

Quick Start

Provide the path to your plan file and initiate the three-role Codex review workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-codex-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate parallel design reviews for plan files before implementation?

Parallel design review assigns plan files to three simultaneous Codex reviewer roles—design, security, and quality/testing—to surface design gaps, risks, and improvement ideas before implementation begins.

Can I use Codex to cross-check plan documents and related design notes together?

Codex cross-checking automatically discovers plan paths, referenced files, and relevant AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md context to evaluate plan documents alongside related design notes simultaneously.

What is the three-role parallel review process for architecture risk analysis?

Three-role parallel review simultaneously applies A: Design Reviewer, B: Security Reviewer, and C: Quality/Testing Reviewer roles to evaluate architecture risks and ensure structured feedback across all perspectives.

How do I consolidate findings from multiple parallel reviewers into a unified verdict?

Structured verdict consolidation aggregates findings from all three parallel reviewer roles into a unified verdict containing consensus points and role-specific insights for implementation decision making.

Do I need to manually specify referenced files when running a plan review?

Artifact discovery guidance automatically identifies plan paths, referenced files, and relevant AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md files to provide full context without manual specification.

When should I run a pre-implementation cross-check on my plan files?

Pre-implementation cross-checks should be run when you need to surface design gaps, security risks, and testing concerns before development starts, ensuring all plan documents are validated.