plan-critiquer

Red-team critique is a brutal, multi-pass analysis of strategic documents to expose blind spots and questionable assumptions. It applies gut checks, assumption hunting, pre-mortems, and competitive analysis to surface risks before execution.

To critique a business plan, provide the strategic document to generate a structured critique report. The process runs multiple passes including gut check, assumption hunting, pre-mortem, and competitive synthesis to produce a risk register and actionable items.

Yes, the critique framework applies to both early-stage ideas and mature programs. It validates validation reports, competitive analyses, business plans, roadmaps, and go-to-market strategies across varying maturity levels.

The best way to challenge assumptions is through a multi-pass critique that hunts for questionable logic and performs pre-mortems. This generates an executive summary with risk registers and actionable items to strengthen the roadmap.

Yes, the critique output integrates with Conductor workflows by mapping findings to specific artifacts like product.md, workflow.md, and tracks.md. It supports context updates and plan refinement based on the critique report.

Automated plan critique requires a well-formed strategic document as input to function effectively. It focuses on identifying risks and blind spots through structured analysis, but cannot replace human judgment in final decision-making.