plan-design-review

Identify missing design decisions in a PLAN and add them before implementation.

Updated Feb 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Analog-Labs/pixelport-launchpad --skill plan-design-review-analog-labs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/Analog-Labs/pixelport-launchpad/tree/main/.agents/skills/gstack/plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Analog-Labs/pixelport-launchpad --skill plan-design-review-analog-labs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The design plan often lacks critical decisions; this skill identifies gaps and adds them to the PLAN before implementation, ensuring a complete and actionable blueprint.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Detects gaps in information architecture, interaction states, user journey, accessibility, and design-system alignment.
  • Proposes concrete, testable design decisions and questions to surface edge cases early.
  • Produces structured outputs to drive alignment and handoff, including NOT in scope, What already exists, TODOS.md updates, and a completion summary.

Quick Start

Review the current PLAN and provide a comprehensive set of improvements and questions to be added to the PLAN before development begins.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify missing design decisions in a plan before implementation?

Design plan review identifies gaps in information architecture, interaction states, user journey, accessibility, and design-system alignment. It adds missing edge cases, empty states, and testable decisions to your plan to ensure a complete, actionable blueprint before development begins.

What is the best way to review a UX design plan for edge cases and accessibility?

The best way to review a UX design plan for edge cases and accessibility is to systematically evaluate every screen and interaction against your design system. This process surfaces missing states, checks accessibility gaps, and proposes concrete questions to drive alignment and handoff.

How do I ensure my design plan covers empty states and design-system alignment?

To ensure your design plan covers empty states and design-system alignment, perform a rigorous plan review that detects gaps across all screens and interactions. This produces a structured completion summary with added decisions and traceable rationale to guide implementation.

Can I use a design review tool to add structured completion summaries to my plan?

Yes, you can use a design review tool to add structured completion summaries to your plan. It evaluates the current plan, proposes concrete decisions, generates recommended questions for each gap, and outputs updates including NOT in scope and existing assets.

What limitations should I expect when reviewing a design plan for missing decisions?

When reviewing a design plan for missing decisions, limitations depend on the existing plan's detail level. The review focuses on plan-level design gaps and edge cases across screens and interactions, but does not implement the design itself; it only outputs recommended questions and traceable rationale.

Do I need an existing design system to check my design plan for gaps?

Having an existing design system helps check alignment and consistency, but the review process can still identify missing decisions, edge cases, and empty states. It evaluates the current plan to surface gaps and produces testable design decisions for implementation handoff.