plan-design-review

Identify missing design decisions in a PLAN and add them before implementation.

Updated Mar 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/antriksh-29/reddit-automation --skill plan-design-review-antriksh-29
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/antriksh-29/reddit-automation/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/antriksh-29/reddit-automation --skill plan-design-review-antriksh-29

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams strengthen plan-level design decisions before any implementation, ensuring that UI/UX choices, accessibility, and information architecture are deliberate and testable.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Identify missing design decisions in a PLAN and add them to the PLAN before implementation.
  • Evaluate the PLAN's UI/UX clarity, accessibility, responsiveness, and consistency, and propose principled trade-offs with concrete rationale.
  • Provide concrete, actionable edits and rationales that can be integrated into the PLAN during the design-review process.

Quick Start

Review the plan file and identify the top 3 design gaps to fix.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a design review for a UI plan and why do I need it before implementation?

A design review evaluates a UI plan to identify missing UI/UX decisions, ensuring information architecture and accessibility choices are deliberate and testable before development begins.

How do I identify missing design decisions in my project plan?

You identify missing design decisions by assessing the plan's UI/UX clarity, accessibility, responsiveness, and consistency, then proposing concrete, verifiable edits to integrate into the plan.

How do you evaluate accessibility and responsiveness in a design plan?

Accessibility and responsiveness are evaluated by reviewing the plan against design principles, identifying gaps in clarity, and proposing principled trade-offs with concrete rationale.

Can I get actionable UI design edits instead of just feedback during a review?

Yes, the review process returns concrete, verifiable edits and rationales that can be directly integrated into the plan during the design-review cycle, rather than just abstract feedback.

What's the best way to propose trade-offs for information architecture issues?

The best way to propose trade-offs is by evaluating information architecture consistency and offering principled, concrete rationale that balances UI/UX clarity with testable design decisions.