plan-design-review

Identify design gaps in plans across information architecture, interaction states, accessibility, and edge cases.

1|Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/apeejay-education/cadencesprout --skill plan-design-review-apeejay-education
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/apeejay-education/cadencesprout/tree/main/.agents/skills/gstack-plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/apeejay-education/cadencesprout --skill plan-design-review-apeejay-education

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Design teams often lack a rigorous pre-build review process, leading to ambiguous plans and missed UX opportunities.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic PLAN critique across information architecture, interaction states, accessibility, and edge cases.
  • Actionable revisions with measurable outcomes that can be tested in the next design sprint.
  • Collaborative feedback loop that surfaces gaps early to keep stakeholders aligned.

Quick Start

Review the PLAN and return a prioritized list of design gaps with suggested improvements.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a UI UX design plan before development starts?

Reviewing a UI UX design plan involves systematically critiquing information architecture, interaction states, accessibility, and edge cases to surface design gaps early and prevent downstream misalignments.

What is a pre-build design critique and why do I need one?

A pre-build design critique is a rigorous review of your design plan to identify missed UX opportunities and ambiguous structures, keeping stakeholders aligned and preventing costly reworks during development.

How do I check my design plan for accessibility and edge cases?

Checking accessibility and edge cases requires applying rigorous design principles across your plan to outline concrete, testable improvements and provide measurable success criteria for validation.

Can I map suggested design improvements to an existing design system?

Yes, during a design review you can describe how concrete improvements map to existing design patterns, ensuring your actionable revisions align with your established design system components.

What is the best way to validate a design plan with a quick review cycle?

The best way to validate a design plan is to run a quick design review cycle that returns a prioritized list of design gaps with actionable revisions and measurable outcomes for the next sprint.

When should I not use an automated design plan review?

Avoid an automated design plan review when your project lacks a defined information architecture or when stakeholder alignment on core UX goals has not yet been established.