plan-design-review

Analyze design plans to surface missing decisions before implementation.

Updated Apr 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/legotec73/gstack --skill plan-design-review-legotec73
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/legotec73/gstack/tree/main/plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/legotec73/gstack --skill plan-design-review-legotec73

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Helps product teams and design leads evaluate a design plan before implementation, surfacing gaps, inconsistencies, and risky assumptions so they can be resolved early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured critique across usability, accessibility, and feasibility
  • Gap identification and actionable recommendations for missing design decisions
  • Alignment checks with goals, constraints, and user needs; supports plan-to-implementation handoff

Quick Start

Review the current design plan and propose the missing design decisions to finalize the plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is design critique for UI UX plans and when do I need it?

Design critique for UI/UX plans evaluates interaction flows and surfaces missing decisions before implementation. You need it to identify risky assumptions, resolve usability and accessibility gaps, and ensure alignment with user needs during early plan-level review.

How do I review a design plan to find missing UI UX decisions?

To review a design plan and find missing UI/UX decisions, apply structured critique across usability, accessibility, and feasibility. Check alignment with goals and constraints, identify decision gaps, and propose actionable recommendations with traceable notes within the plan document.

Can I use plan design review for interaction flows within gstack plans?

Yes, you can use plan design review for interaction flows within gstack plans. It evaluates plan-level UI/UX designs, checks goal alignment, and supports plan-to-implementation handoff by providing actionable recommendations and traceable notes for missing design decisions.

What's the best way to surface risky assumptions in a design plan before implementation?

The best way to surface risky assumptions in a design plan is to run a structured design critique focusing on gap identification. Evaluate usability, accessibility, and feasibility constraints, then document actionable recommendations and traceable notes to finalize the plan.

Does design critique for plans support handoff to implementation?

Yes, design critique for plans supports handoff to implementation. It aligns design plans with goals, constraints, and user needs, then outputs actionable recommendations and traceable notes within the plan document to guide the development team during implementation.