plan-design-review

A design plan review scores your plan across multiple dimensions 0-10, identifies weaknesses, and prescribes concrete fixes. It provides interactive scoring with clear rationale for improvements and actionable steps to implement revisions within plan mode.

The best way to assess a design plan is running a guided critique that validates decisions and evaluates dimensions numerically. This process rates each area 0-10, explains what would move a score to 10, and automatically suggests plan revisions for engineering or CEO review contexts.

Yes, you can get automated suggestions for improving your design plan during a live site audit. The critique workflow proactively highlights what to change to reach a higher score and suggests concrete plan revisions to implement fixes directly within plan mode.

You rate design dimensions by scoring each area from 0-10 with explicit rationale for each rating. The critique workflow explains exactly what would move a specific score to 10, ensuring you understand the requirements for achieving higher plan quality.

No specific frameworks or dependencies are required for the design review process. The assessment operates independently to score design plans, identify weaknesses, and prescribe fixes, making it suitable for live site audits and engineering style critiques without setup barriers.

You should not use an automated design critique when you need subjective aesthetic validation rather than structured dimensional scoring. This process focuses on rating specific design dimensions 0-10 and generating concrete implementation steps, which may not suit abstract creative exploration.