plan-design-review

Identify and strengthen missing design decisions in PLAN reviews.

2|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/OmerFarukOruc/symphony-orchestrator --skill plan-design-review-omerfarukoruc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/OmerFarukOruc/symphony-orchestrator/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OmerFarukOruc/symphony-orchestrator --skill plan-design-review-omerfarukoruc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The Skill helps product teams tighten plan-level design reviews by identifying gaps and forcing explicit design decisions before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive plan critique across design principles, accessibility, responsiveness, and user journeys.
  • Actionable suggestions and concrete decisions added to the plan to prevent scope creep.
  • Collaboration-friendly notes that surface missing decisions and trade-offs.

Quick Start

Review a PLAN — provide a design critique and propose concrete missing decisions to add.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a plan-level design review and when do I need it?

A plan-level design review identifies missing UI decisions, empty states, and accessibility gaps before implementation begins. You need it to harden interaction flows and responsive behavior plans, preventing scope creep during the build phase.

How do I critique a UI design plan before implementation?

To critique a UI design plan, evaluate user journeys, accessibility, and responsive behavior across devices. Propose concrete missing decisions for error handling and empty states, aligning the plan with universal design principles.

Does this design review process check accessibility and responsive behavior?

Yes, the design review process checks accessibility and responsive behavior across devices. It forces explicit design choices for interaction flows, ensuring empty states and error handling are fully defined before development.

What is the best way to prevent scope creep in UX design plans?

The best way to prevent scope creep in UX design plans is to force explicit design choices during a plan critique. Surfaces missing decisions and trade-offs early, adding concrete actionable suggestions to the plan before build.

Can I use this to review empty states and error handling in my design system?

Yes, you can review empty states and error handling in your design system. The critique requires explicit design choices for these elements, ensuring your UI systems and interaction flows align with defined design principles.

What happens if my plan is missing explicit design choices for interaction flows?

If your plan is missing explicit design choices, the critique identifies those gaps and proposes actionable decisions to add. This hardens your interaction flows and prevents unresolved user journey issues from reaching implementation.