plan-design-review

To review a UI design plan, analyze the document to surface gaps and missing decisions, outputting clear questions, TODOs, and risk flags to ensure explicit user journeys, empty states, and accessibility before implementation.

Design plan critique is the process of evaluating design decisions to ensure they are explicit, actionable, and testable. It is needed to reduce ambiguity and rework by surfacing rationale gaps before implementation begins.

Checking accessibility and empty states involves analyzing the UI plan to verify these considerations are explicitly defined, generating structured ASK-style questions and TODOs for any missing design decisions or responsive behavior gaps.

Yes, you can generate actionable TODOs and risk flags by analyzing the design plan to identify missing decisions, outputting a structured design-review report with precise questions and decision records to guide implementation and handoffs.

Yes, the design review process works without external dependencies, analyzing UI plans independently to output clear questions, recommendations, and TODOs in a consistent ASK-style format for explicit decision tracking.

The best way to align a UI plan with a DESIGN.md file is to analyze the plan for explicit decisions, ensuring its user journeys, interactions, and system constraints match the documented design system requirements before implementation.