plan-design-review

Review UI/UX design plans for gaps and add concrete design decisions.

3|3|Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tsensei/ReelMistri --skill plan-design-review-tsensei
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/tsensei/ReelMistri/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tsensei/ReelMistri --skill plan-design-review-tsensei

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Design plans often ship UI gaps and vague guidelines. This Skill identifies missing decisions, clarifies scope, and ensures choices align with design principles before implementation, reducing rework and misalignment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic design-gap detection and explicit decision prompts to close gaps before development.
  • Edge-case and accessibility coverage to prevent fragile user experiences.
  • Structured plan augmentation: adds concrete design decisions, priority recommendations, and risk flags for design reviews.

Quick Start

Load the current plan file and run the design-review to generate a prioritized critique and actionable fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I find missing UI elements in my design plan before development?

Finding missing UI elements in a design plan requires systematic design-gap detection that identifies vague guidelines and prompts explicit design decisions to close those gaps before development begins.

What is a UI/UX design review and when do I need it?

A UI/UX design review is a systematic critique of plan documents to identify missing decisions, clarify scope, and ensure choices align with design principles, needed before implementation to reduce rework and misalignment.

How do I ensure my design plan covers accessibility and edge cases?

To ensure your design plan covers accessibility and edge cases, apply a structured plan augmentation that adds concrete design decisions, priority recommendations, and risk flags to prevent fragile user experiences.

Can I use this to review empty states and responsive behavior in my plan?

Yes, you can review empty states and responsive behavior by critically evaluating the design scope and plan documents to produce actionable recommendations and concrete decisions for those specific UI scenarios.

What is the best way to critique a design scope for implementation readiness?

The best way to critique a design scope for implementation readiness is to perform structured plan augmentation that generates prioritized recommendations, risk flags, and concrete decisions to resolve ambiguities.

Why does my UI implementation have gaps and vague guidelines from the design plan?

Your UI implementation has gaps and vague guidelines because the initial design plan lacked systematic critique to identify missing decisions and ensure choices aligned with core design principles before development.