plan-design-review

Review a design plan by analyzing the PLAN document to flag ambiguities across empty states, interaction flows, and accessibility, generating concrete decision options with rationale to fill gaps before implementation.

Design plan gap analysis is the process of identifying missing design decisions in a PLAN document before implementation. You need it during PLAN reviews to ensure empty states, accessibility, and design-system alignment are explicitly specified and testable.

Check design plan alignment by analyzing the PLAN document for design-system compliance gaps. The review flags missing specifications and outputs actionable TODOs added directly to the plan to guide implementation and maintain design integrity.

Yes, you can generate actionable TODOs from a UX review by analyzing the PLAN document. The process surfaces missing design decisions, proposes concrete alternatives with trade-offs, and outputs structured TODOs for the design team.

The best way to ensure accessibility is specified is through a principled design plan critique that identifies missing accessibility decisions in the PLAN document, proposes concrete alternatives with rationale, and adds structured TODOs for the design team.

Your design plan lacks testable interaction decisions because missing specifications were never explicitly surfaced. A dense gap analysis flags these ambiguities, proposes concrete alternatives with trade-offs, and outputs structured TODOs to resolve them.