plan-eng-review

Engineering plan review identifies gaps and risks across architecture, data flow, and edge cases, then surfaces concrete tradeoffs and recommendations. It produces opinionated guidance, ASCII diagrams, and a concise scope decision to keep the plan focused.

The best way to surface tradeoffs is through an opinionated plan review that evaluates architecture, diagrams, edge cases, and test coverage. This process documents failure modes, dependencies, and testing implications to ensure clarity before implementation.

Yes, you can use a guided question flow to solidify engineering decisions. The review process interfaces with users by presenting 2-3 options at a time, gathering input to solidify decisions and outline maintainable scope before changes are made.

To document failure modes and testing implications, apply an opinionated plan review that analyzes architecture and data flow. The review explicitly outlines dependencies, edge cases, and test coverage to produce concrete recommendations and minimal diff scope.

Plan review helps maintain minimal diff and manageable scope by producing a concise scope decision. It emphasizes maintainable scope through architecture analysis, ASCII diagram guidance, and explicit tradeoffs to keep the engineering plan focused.

To generate ASCII diagrams for engineering plan reviews, apply an opinionated review process that outlines architecture and data flow. The review produces ASCII diagram guidance alongside concrete recommendations to visualize system structure and maintain scope.