plan-eng-review

Guide structured engineering plan reviews covering architecture, data flow, tests, and performance.

43|7|Updated Mar 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lucas-flatwhite/gstack-ko --skill plan-eng-review-lucas-flatwhite
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-eng-review
Source: https://github.com/lucas-flatwhite/gstack-ko/tree/main/plan-eng-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lucas-flatwhite/gstack-ko --skill plan-eng-review-lucas-flatwhite

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps engineering managers run structured reviews to lock in architecture, data flow, edge cases, test coverage, and performance plans.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guides architecture and plan reviews to align stakeholders.
  • Analyzes data flow diagrams, risk areas, and test coverage.
  • Provides opinionated recommendations and completeness guidance during design reviews.

Quick Start

Invoke /plan-eng-review to start an interactive manager-mode plan review that locks in architecture, data flows, edge cases, tests, and performance expectations before coding.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-eng-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a structured architecture review before coding starts?

Run a structured architecture review by validating your design doc against scope checks, data flow diagrams, and risk assessments to align stakeholders and prevent costly downstream changes.

What should an engineering plan review cover to prevent downstream design changes?

An engineering plan review should cover architecture, data flow, edge cases, test coverage, and performance expectations, providing opinionated recommendations and completeness guidance to lock in the design.

Can I use a plan review to validate test coverage and edge cases for my system?

Yes, you can validate test coverage and edge cases during a plan review to proactively assess risk areas and data flow diagrams, ensuring completeness before implementation begins.

What's the best way to align stakeholders on engineering scope and risk management?

Align stakeholders on engineering scope and risk management by guiding the team through an interactive review that emphasizes thorough scope checks, proactive design critique, and completeness guidance.

When do I need a formal design doc validation for architecture and data flow?

You need a formal design doc validation when you must lock in architecture and data flow with confidence, particularly to perform risk assessment and proactive design critique before committing to code.

Does an engineering plan review help with performance considerations and completeness?

Yes, an engineering plan review helps with performance considerations and completeness by providing opinionated recommendations that ensure architecture, tests, and data flows are fully validated.