plan-eng-review

To automate a qualitative audit for engineering design docs, use a skill that performs mechanical validation and qualitative analysis to ensure architectural coherence and structural completeness. This process checks required sections, failure-mode registries, and test coverage standards.

Mechanical validation for design document reviews is an automated process that checks for required sections, missing stubs, and valid frontmatter status transitions. It enforces structural integrity before applying deeper qualitative analysis to architecture and test coverage.

Yes, you need a structured design doc scaffold to review architecture and failure-mode registries. The audit process requires this structured input alongside the plan-eng-review-audit binary to execute validation and mutation tasks successfully.

Yes, you can use automated quality assurance to check diagram staleness during technical planning. The audit evaluates diagram staleness using expert-level heuristics alongside architecture coherence and failure-mode registry validation.

To handle lifecycle management after a design doc review, the audit process automatically manages status updates, telemetry logging, and restore-point snapshots upon successful completion. This ensures your technical planning documents maintain valid state transitions.

Limitations of automated engineering design doc audits include dependency on a structured scaffold and the plan-eng-review-audit binary for execution. The audit cannot validate content outside this structure and relies on expert-level heuristics rather than human contextual judgment.