plan-eng-review

Automate technical plan reviews for architecture, code quality, testing, and performance.

Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sadie100/claude-dotfiles --skill plan-eng-review-sadie100
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-eng-review
Source: https://github.com/sadie100/claude-dotfiles/tree/main/skills/plan-eng-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sadie100/claude-dotfiles --skill plan-eng-review-sadie100

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires gstack, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill automates the review of technical plans, providing a structured approach to catch architecture issues, ensure comprehensive coverage, and facilitate knowledge transfer.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Review Process: Standardizes the review process for architecture, code quality, testing, and performance.
  • Collaborative Decision Making: Facilitates interactive decision-making through the AskUserQuestion format.
  • Outside Voice Integration: Incorporates a second opinion from a different AI system for enhanced review coverage.
  • Use Case: When a technical architect needs to review a complex plan or design document, this skill helps ensure all critical aspects are considered.

Quick Start

Use the plan-eng-review skill to review the architecture of your project.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-eng-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate technical plan reviews for architecture and code quality?

You can automate technical plan reviews by running structured checks for architecture validation, code quality analysis, test coverage verification, and performance profiling to catch design issues early.

What is the best way to standardize architecture validation and test coverage verification?

Standardizing architecture validation involves applying a consistent review process across technical plans to ensure comprehensive coverage of code quality, testing, and performance metrics.

How does interactive decision-making work during a technical review?

Interactive decision-making during a technical review uses a question-and-answer format to facilitate collaborative choices, ensuring critical aspects of the plan are considered before proceeding.

Can I incorporate an outside AI review for added depth in performance profiling?

Yes, you can incorporate an outside AI review to provide a second opinion, enhancing the overall coverage and depth of the architecture and performance analysis.

Do I need a structured plan to perform code quality analysis and architecture validation?

Yes, a structured plan is required to execute automated checks like architecture validation and code quality analysis effectively.

What are the limitations of automating plan reviews for technical architects?

Automated plan reviews require a structured plan to function, meaning unstructured design documents cannot be processed without prior formatting into a compatible input format.