plan-eng-review

Identify gaps in engineering plans and surface actionable recommendations for architecture review.

Updated Mar 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/soyasis/gstack-private --skill plan-eng-review-soyasis
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-eng-review
Source: https://github.com/soyasis/gstack-private/tree/main/plan-eng-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/soyasis/gstack-private --skill plan-eng-review-soyasis

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Engineering managers often spend hours trying to compile a cohesive execution plan for complex software designs. Plan-eng-review provides a structured, interactive process to lock in architecture, data flows, edge cases, test coverage, and performance criteria before coding begins.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Step-by-step prompts that surface architectural decisions, tradeoffs, and risk.
  • Interactive questions and recommendations that guide design discussions and capture decisions in a plan.
  • Lightweight outputs (diagrams, notes, and action items) suitable for review with teammates prior to implementation.
  • Use cases include evaluating new architecture proposals, validating data flow, and ensuring comprehensive test and performance plans.

Quick Start

Run plan-eng-review to lock the architecture, data flow, edge cases, test coverage, and performance plan before coding.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-eng-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review an engineering plan before coding begins?

Review an engineering plan by using a structured, interactive process to lock in architecture, data flows, edge cases, and test coverage before coding begins. This surfaces architectural decisions, tradeoffs, and risks through step-by-step prompts.

What is the best way to identify gaps in an architecture proposal?

Identify gaps in an architecture proposal by running an end-to-end architecture review that scopes data flow, diagrams, edge cases, and performance criteria, providing opinionated recommendations to guide interactive design discussions.

Can I use interactive prompts to capture architectural decisions and tradeoffs?

Yes, you can use interactive prompts to capture architectural decisions and tradeoffs. The process guides design discussions and outputs lightweight notes, diagrams, and action items suitable for teammate review.

How do I ensure test coverage and performance criteria are included in my design plan?

Ensure test coverage and performance criteria are included by evaluating your design plan through a structured review that explicitly scopes these areas, surfacing actionable recommendations before implementation starts.

Does this engineering plan review process generate diagrams and action items?

Yes, the engineering plan review generates lightweight outputs including diagrams, notes, and action items. These outputs are designed for review with teammates to ensure alignment on architecture and execution plans.

When do I need a structured architecture review for new software designs?

You need a structured architecture review when evaluating new architecture proposals, validating data flow, and ensuring comprehensive test and performance plans to avoid spending hours compiling a cohesive execution plan manually.