plan-eng-review

To validate an engineering plan, you need a review process that surfaces architecture gaps, hidden assumptions, and test coverage deficiencies. This forces critical design flaws into the open before any code is written, preventing costly rework later.

An engineering review should include architecture diagrams, state machine sketches, data model impact analysis, edge case enumeration, and a test matrix. These components ensure comprehensive coverage of new feature proposals and identify potential failure modes.

Generating a test matrix and edge cases requires analyzing the feature plan to enumerate failure modes and boundary conditions. The review process systematically extracts these scenarios to ensure comprehensive test coverage before implementation begins.

You need a state machine sketch during data model impact analysis when introducing new components or state transitions. It helps flag conflicts with existing designs and clarifies how API changes and migration needs affect current system states.

Yes, this engineering review workflow applies to feature proposals after CEO approval. It serves as a technical validation gate, generating a final verdict, markdown documentation, and a Slack notification to communicate the review status.

The best way to document plan validation results is to generate an ASCII architecture diagram and output a markdown review file. Saving this to a dedicated documentation directory ensures the engineering review remains accessible for future reference and team alignment.