plan-executor:review-execution-output

Coordinate multiple reviewer agents to triage plan execution output issues.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/andreas-pohl-parloa/plan-executor-plugin --skill plan-executor-review-execution-output
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-executor:review-execution-output
Source: https://github.com/andreas-pohl-parloa/plan-executor-plugin/tree/main/plugins/plan-executor/skills/review-execution-output
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/andreas-pohl-parloa/plan-executor-plugin --skill plan-executor-review-execution-output

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill simplifies the process of reviewing the output of automated plan executions, enabling faster identification and triage of issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interactive Review Loop: Facilitates deterministic code review in the same agent as the orchestrator, coordinating multiple reviewers.
  • Triaging and Retry Management: Manages review state, handles retries, and groups issues for efficient resolution.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill to review the results after deploying a code change, ensuring all issues are addressed before proceeding.

Quick Start

Run the review execution output Skill with the plan path and execution results to initiate a review cycle and triage output issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-executor:review-execution-output

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review after plan execution in AI workflows?

Automated code review after plan execution is handled through an interactive review loop that coordinates multiple reviewer agents to validate execution outputs. The system manages review state and triages identified issues to streamline the validation process.

What is the best way to triage issues found during automated plan execution?

Triage issues during automated plan execution by grouping them for efficient resolution and managing retries within the orchestration workflow. The system handles review state and generates fix prompts to ensure comprehensive coverage of identified problems.

How do I coordinate multiple reviewer agents for deterministic code review?

Coordinate multiple reviewer agents by facilitating an interactive review loop within the same agent as the orchestrator. This approach manages the review state efficiently and supports deferred decisions to ensure comprehensive quality assurance.

Can I manage retries and deferred decisions in an automated testing review loop?

Yes, you can manage retries and support deferred decisions within an automated testing review loop. The system handles review state efficiently, triages issues, and generates fix prompts as needed to enhance the quality assurance process.

Do I need specific dependencies to run a structured review of execution outputs?

No specific dependencies are required to run a structured review of execution outputs. You initiate a review cycle by providing the plan path and execution results, allowing the system to coordinate reviewers and triage output issues independently.

When should I use an interactive review loop for plan execution outputs?

Use an interactive review loop for plan execution outputs when you need to validate code changes before proceeding and ensure all issues are addressed. It is specifically designed for automated planning environments requiring comprehensive quality assurance and triage management.