plan-incorporate

You can integrate review feedback into a plan doc by updating the source markdown, adding a disposition table for the current round, and validating changes before writing updates. This ensures traceability across multiple review rounds.

A disposition table tracks how external review findings are resolved across multiple rounds. It enforces prior decisions, maintains a structured history of feedback integration, and validates new changes before updating the main plan and test harness.

Automating markdown updates with peer review feedback requires parsing disposition tables, extracting review rounds, and enforcing prior decisions. The final validated plan is then exported for commit, cleaning up review files in the process.

Yes, coordinating multi-round reviews involves parsing disposition tables to extract rounds, enforcing prior decisions, and validating changes before writing updates to the docs/plans. This ensures consistency and traceability across all review cycles.

Incorporating review feedback updates both the main plan and the test harness if applicable. It validates the disposition tables and coordinates changes before writing updates to the docs/plans and exporting the final plan for commit.

Automating review disposition requires structured disposition tables to parse and validate; without proper markdown formatting, the validation may fail. It is limited to updating docs/plans and the test harness, cleaning up review files after integration.