plan

To generate a high-level design document, analyze your requirement files and codebase maps to produce a standardized artifact covering architecture, data lifecycle, and non-functional requirements. This structured approach ensures all technical and risk-related requirements are addressed before implementation begins.

Identifying architectural trade-offs and risks during software planning involves using an interactive resolution loop to surface ambiguities and assumptions. Validating design completeness against project constraints ensures a robust technical foundation and prevents architectural drift across the team.

Yes, automated high-level design enforces consistent architecture by standardizing the planning process. It validates design completeness against defined execution modes and project constraints, eliminating inconsistent design practices and ensuring team-wide alignment before implementation.

To resolve non-functional requirements and ambiguities when planning a software feature, engage with an interactive open-question loop. This process facilitates real-time resolution of assumptions and trade-offs, thoroughly vetting the feature against existing codebase maps.

Standardized high-level design for software workflows requires existing requirement files and codebase maps to function effectively. Without these inputs, the interactive resolution loop cannot accurately identify architectural trade-offs, non-functional requirements, or validate design completeness against project constraints.