plan

Generate executable planning workflows with interview, direct, and consensus modes.

1|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw --skill plan-linnanli
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan
Source: https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw/tree/main/.codex/skills/plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw --skill plan-linnanli

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Plan provides structured, multi-mode planning workflows to turn vague goals into executable roadmaps, balancing discovery through interviews with direct planning and iterative refinement via a consensus loop.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mode selection: Interview, Direct, Consensus, and Review to match the task context.
  • Automated exploration: integrates lightweight codebase facts gathering before interviews to ground discussions.
  • Multi-role review: Planner -> Architect -> Critic loop (RALPLAN-DR) for high-stakes planning with risk-aware validation.
  • Drafting plans: produces concrete implementation steps, acceptance criteria, and ADR/follow-ups for traceability.
  • Review mode: allows independent critique and quality assurance without regenerating the plan.

Quick Start

Describe your goal and constraints to have Plan generate a structured, executable work plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn vague project goals into executable planning workflows with clear acceptance criteria?

Executable planning workflows transform vague goals into structured roadmaps by balancing interview-based requirements discovery with direct planning and iterative consensus refinement to produce clear acceptance criteria.

What is the best way to gather requirements for complex tasks across multiple stakeholders?

Requirements discovery for complex tasks across multiple stakeholders is best handled through interview-based exploration, grounded by lightweight codebase facts gathering to anchor discussions and ensure traceable execution plans.

How does multi-role review work for high-stakes project planning and risk-aware decision making?

Multi-role review applies a Planner, Architect, and Critic loop to validate high-stakes planning through risk-aware decision making, ensuring independent critique and quality assurance before finalizing implementation steps.

When do I need consensus-based refinement instead of direct planning for project requirements?

Consensus-based refinement is needed when project requirements demand iterative alignment across stakeholders, whereas direct planning suits tasks with predefined constraints and immediate execution needs.

Can I review and critique a generated plan independently without regenerating the entire workflow?

Yes, Review mode allows you to critique a generated plan independently for quality assurance without regenerating the entire planning workflow or modifying the existing implementation steps.

What are the limitations of automated codebase exploration during requirements discovery?

Automated codebase exploration during requirements discovery serves only as a lightweight facts gathering mechanism to ground interviews, requiring subsequent stakeholder validation to mitigate planning risks.