plan-pipeline-validate

Validate pipeline plans with structural checks and specialist reviews.

Updated May 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alexica00/claude-code-ultimate-guide --skill plan-pipeline-validate-alexica00
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-pipeline-validate
Source: https://github.com/alexica00/claude-code-ultimate-guide/tree/main/examples/skills/plan-pipeline/validate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alexica00/claude-code-ultimate-guide --skill plan-pipeline-validate-alexica00

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill prevents misconfigured or risky plan executions by validating the plan produced by /plan-pipeline:start through a two-layer process: structural checks and specialist agent validation, with auto-fix guidance grounded in ADRs and first principles.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structural Validation: verifies plan format, dependencies, ADR-consistency, and task completeness before execution.
  • Specialist Validation: concurrently runs security, database, performance, design-system, UX, cross-platform, and integration reviews to surface issues.
  • Auto-Fix & Governance: triages issues, applies ADR-aligned resolutions, and records decisions for governance.

Quick Start

Run /plan-pipeline:validate to assess the latest plan and surface Layer 1 and Layer 2 findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-pipeline-validate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate a software engineering plan for structural integrity and security before execution?

Plan validation applies Layer 1 structural checks and Layer 2 specialist reviews across security, data, performance, and governance to surface issues before execution. It enforces ADR alignment, tracks dependencies, and auto-suggests fixes to ensure a clean plan.

What is two-layer plan validation and how does it prevent risky executions?

Two-layer plan validation prevents misconfigured or risky executions by verifying plan format, dependencies, and ADR-consistency, then concurrently running security, database, performance, and integration reviews to surface issues with auto-fix guidance.

How do I ensure my project plan aligns with existing Architecture Decision Records?

You ensure ADR alignment by running plan validation that checks task completeness and consistency against recorded decisions, automatically suggesting ADR updates or fixes to resolve any governance conflicts before execution.

Can I use automated plan validation for software engineering tasks without writing custom rules?

Yes, automated plan validation runs predefined structural checks and concurrent specialist agent reviews across security, performance, and governance out of the box. It triages issues and applies ADR-aligned resolutions without requiring custom rule creation.

What's the best way to automate quality assurance and governance checks for a software execution plan?

The best way to automate quality assurance and governance is using a validation skill that concurrently runs specialist reviews, enforces ADR alignment, tracks dependencies, and records decisions for governance while auto-suggesting fixes.

Why does my execution plan fail dependency tracking and ADR consistency checks?

Plans fail dependency tracking and ADR consistency checks when structural validation surfaces incomplete tasks or misaligned decisions. Running a two-layer validation triages these issues, applies ADR-aligned resolutions, and records updates for governance.