plan-review

Review implementation plans across five dimensions against codebase context.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/adrianschmidt/workspace-config --skill plan-review-adrianschmidt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-review
Source: https://github.com/adrianschmidt/workspace-config/tree/main/claude/skills/plan-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/adrianschmidt/workspace-config --skill plan-review-adrianschmidt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the comprehensive review of implementation plans, ensuring they are complete, feasible, well-architected, low-risk, and appropriately scoped before execution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-dimensional Plan Analysis: Evaluates plans across five critical dimensions: completeness, feasibility, architecture, risk, and scope.
  • Codebase Integration: Leverages codebase context to validate plan assumptions and identify potential issues.
  • Use Case: Before deploying a new feature, use this Skill to get a detailed, multi-agent review of the implementation plan, catching potential problems early.

Quick Start

Review the plan located at ~/.claude/plans/feature-x-implementation.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review an implementation plan for completeness and feasibility?

To review an implementation plan for completeness and feasibility, you need a multi-agent analysis that evaluates steps across five dimensions and validates assumptions against codebase context to synthesize a consolidated readiness report.

What is a multi-dimensional plan review in software engineering?

A multi-dimensional plan review evaluates implementation proposals across completeness, feasibility, architecture, risk, and scope, leveraging codebase context to validate assumptions and synthesize findings into an overall readiness assessment.

How do I assess architecture and scope risks before implementing a feature?

Assessing architecture and scope risks before implementation requires validating plan steps against the existing codebase to identify potential issues early, ensuring proposals are well-architected, low-risk, and appropriately scoped.

Can I validate implementation plan assumptions against my codebase automatically?

You can validate implementation plan assumptions against your codebase automatically by using read, grep, and glob tools to check plan steps against repository context, catching potential architecture and feasibility problems before execution.

What's the best way to catch potential problems in an implementation plan before execution?

The best way to catch potential problems in an implementation plan before execution is conducting a multi-agent review that analyzes completeness, feasibility, architecture, risk, and scope to produce a consolidated report with an overall readiness assessment.