plan-review

To validate an implementation plan before coding, use a multi-agent review process to analyze markdown plan text and codebase context. This identifies design flaws, logic errors, and performance concerns, synthesizing findings into an actionable report categorized by RETHINK, REVISE, or WATCH.

Reviewing a markdown design document for logic gaps is best handled by specialist AI agents that assess correctness, footguns, and simplification opportunities. They merge findings into a consolidated report to ensure plan robustness and efficiency before development begins.

Assess performance risks in a development plan by employing specialist agents to evaluate the plan text alongside codebase context and scope charters. This proactive risk assessment identifies potential performance issues and complexity before implementation starts.

Automated plan validation can be used on any markdown implementation plan. It analyzes the plan text, codebase context, and scope charters to proactively identify design flaws, logic gaps, and potential performance issues before development begins.

You need to perform a plan review after selecting an implementation approach but before writing any code. This ensures the resulting markdown plan is robust and efficient, preventing design flaws and logic errors from reaching the development phase.