skills.rest
dr-code
dr-codeCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

plan-review

Review execution plans with Codex CLI and surface architecture risks.

Updated Mar 10, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#risk-assessment#code-review#plan-review#go-no-go#codex-cli
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dr-code/tessera --skill plan-review-dr-code
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-review
Source: https://github.com/dr-code/tessera/tree/main/skills/plan-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dr-code/tessera --skill plan-review-dr-code

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Validating an execution plan before implementation to catch issues early and provide independent feedback that informs go/no-go decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent review of a written plan using Codex CLI to surface architecture concerns, edge cases, and risk.
  • Structured feedback with agreement/disagreement and a clear go/no-go verdict to guide implementation decisions.
  • Use Case: A team submits a plan for review to identify blockers, missing dependencies, and potential security concerns before coding begins.

Quick Start

Integrate by running the plan-review tool with your plan file to start an independent review.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate an execution plan before implementation?▼

To validate an execution plan, you need independent review to surface architecture issues, missing edge cases, and risks. This Skill analyzes your written plan document and codebase context to provide structured feedback and a go/no-go verdict.

What is independent plan review and how does it work?▼

Independent plan review is the process of evaluating a written plan before coding begins. Using Codex CLI, this Skill analyzes the plan and available codebase context to identify blockers, missing dependencies, and potential security concerns.

Can I use codebase context to enrich plan risk assessment feedback?▼

Yes, you can enrich plan risk assessment by providing codebase context grounding via tessera MCP. This additional context allows the review process to surface deeper architecture concerns and identify missing edge cases more accurately.

Does Codex CLI support go/no-go decisions for architecture plans?▼

Yes, Codex CLI supports go/no-go decisions by providing structured feedback on architecture plans. It evaluates the submitted plan to identify blockers and missing dependencies, delivering a clear verdict to guide your implementation decisions.

What do I need to run a plan review using Codex CLI?▼

To run a plan review, you need a written plan document as input. If available, you should also provide codebase context grounding via tessera MCP to enrich the feedback and improve the accuracy of the risk assessment.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
pingqLINpingqLIN

plan-first-execution

Draft executable plans with objective, scope, steps, and verification before work.

Community
Intermediate
leksaleksa

Effective Go

Apply Effective Go best practices to write idiomatic Go code.

Community
Intermediate
tilework-techtilework-tech
149

Brainstorming

Transform rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured questioning.

Official
Basic
pixiesgeosunpixiesgeosun

skill-vetter

Review AI agent skills for security risks before installation.

Community
Advanced