plan-review-gate

Spawn three independent reviewers to assess implementation plan feasibility, completeness, and scope alignment.

379|51|Updated Feb 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dsifry/metaswarm --skill plan-review-gate
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-review-gate
Source: https://github.com/dsifry/metaswarm/tree/main/.claude/plugins/metaswarm/skills/plan-review-gate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dsifry/metaswarm --skill plan-review-gate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures that no implementation plan is presented to the user without first undergoing rigorous, independent adversarial scrutiny, preventing flawed or incomplete plans from proceeding.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Adversarial Review: Spawns three independent reviewers (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) in parallel.
  • Iterative Feedback Loop: Plans are revised and re-reviewed until consensus is reached or a maximum iteration limit is hit.
  • Use Case: Before a complex feature is coded, this Skill automatically checks if the proposed implementation plan is technically feasible, fully addresses the requirements, and doesn't introduce unnecessary scope creep, catching potential issues early.

Quick Start

Use the plan-review-gate skill to automatically review the drafted implementation plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-review-gate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial review for a software implementation plan?

Adversarial review for software implementation plans is automated by spawning three independent reviewers to assess feasibility, completeness, and scope alignment. It iteratively revises based on feedback until consensus is reached or three iterations complete.

What is the best way to prevent scope creep before coding a complex feature?

To prevent scope creep before coding, an automated review gate checks if the proposed implementation plan is fully feasible, addresses requirements, and aligns with scope. Flawed plans are caught early before execution proceeds.

How does an automated code review gate validate technical feasibility?

Automated code review gates validate technical feasibility by spawning independent reviewers in parallel to scrutinize the implementation plan. They iteratively revise the plan based on reviewer feedback until consensus is achieved or iterations max out.

How many iterations does the plan review process run before stopping?

The plan review process runs a maximum of three iterations. It automatically halts the adversarial review loop once the independent reviewers achieve consensus or the maximum iteration limit is reached.

When should I use an automated plan review gate in software development?

Use an automated plan review gate in software development before a complex feature is coded. It ensures no implementation plan is presented without rigorous independent scrutiny, verifying feasibility, completeness, and scope alignment.