plan-review-gate

Validate implementation plans via three independent adversarial review agents.

Updated Feb 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jpeggdev/buildwithjpegg --skill plan-review-gate-jpeggdev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-review-gate
Source: https://github.com/jpeggdev/buildwithjpegg/tree/main/plugins/tribunal/skills/plan-review-gate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jpeggdev/buildwithjpegg --skill plan-review-gate-jpeggdev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill prevents flawed or incomplete implementation plans from being presented to users by subjecting them to rigorous, independent adversarial review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Adversarial Review: Spawns three distinct reviewers (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) in parallel to scrutinize implementation plans.
  • Iterative Feedback Loop: Automatically revises plans based on reviewer feedback and re-reviews until consensus is reached or a maximum iteration limit is hit.
  • Use Case: Before a complex feature plan is shown to a product manager, this skill ensures it's technically feasible, fully covers requirements, and doesn't introduce unnecessary scope, catching critical issues early.

Quick Start

Use the plan-review-gate skill to validate the implementation plan located at 'plans/new-feature.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-review-gate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is an adversarial plan review process in software development?

Adversarial plan review is a validation process where multiple independent agents scrutinize an implementation plan for feasibility, completeness, and scope alignment before it reaches the user.

How do I validate an implementation plan against scope and feasibility requirements?

You validate an implementation plan by running it through an automated adversarial review gate that checks technical feasibility, requirement completeness, and scope alignment using independent parallel reviewers.

Can I use automated code review to catch incomplete feature plans before user presentation?

Yes, automated adversarial review gates catch incomplete feature plans by spawning distinct reviewers that ensure plans are executable, comprehensive, and aligned with user requests before presentation.

What happens if reviewers reject a plan during the quality gate validation process?

During quality gate validation, rejected plans enter an iterative feedback loop where the system automatically revises the plan based on reviewer feedback and re-reviews it until consensus is reached.

Are there limitations to how many times a plan can be revised during adversarial testing?

Adversarial testing handles iterative feedback automatically but escalates after a maximum of three review cycles if the independent reviewers cannot reach a consensus on the implementation plan.

What's the best way to ensure software development plans survive rigorous quality gates?

The best way to ensure plans survive quality gates is using an adversarial review process that automatically validates implementation plans for feasibility, completeness, and scope alignment before presentation.